Saturday, July 30, 2011

John O’Reilly ‘Recent Montage’ Tibor De Nagy Gallery

Tibor De Nagy’s first exhibition with the veteran collage artist John O’Reilly incorporates images of the sea, art history and gay pornography into a textured whole. O’Reilly’s work explores the relationship between eroticism and art, nature and the self and the bricolage of desire. O’Reilly, who is 81 and has only begun to display his artwork in the last fifteen years, uses collage in an old fashioned manner to make a contemporary point. Resolutely analog, O’Reilly’s montages repositions desire, real embodied sexual desire, into the forefront of his work.  O’Reilly sees the classical in the pornographic and the erotic in the classical; notice his The Kiss which shows two men kissing superimposed over Ingres’ portrait of Paganini.
John O’Reilly takes two inheritances from the past, the Classical fragment and the Modernist layering, and superimposed them into a formalized erotic composition.  Ruin, classical ruins and Modernist ruins, are pasted together in O’Reilly’s montages to call forth the implied connection between the two systems. For O’Reilly the connection is desire and loss; sexuality stands next to ruin in the montages.
 In addition to the art history cues, classical and literary references proliferate. Constantine Cavafy, a poet working with the same inherited ruins as O’Reilly, evoked the same loss as O’Reilly in his poem Candles


Days to come stand in front of us
like a row of lighted candles—
golden, warm, and vivid candles.
 
Days gone by fall behind us,
a gloomy line of snuffed-out candles;
the nearest are smoking still,
cold, melted, and bent.
 
I don’t want to look at them: their shape saddens me,
and it saddens me to remember their original light.
I look ahead at my lighted candles.
 
I don’t want to turn for fear of seeing, terrified,
how quickly that dark line gets longer,
how quickly the snuffed-out candles proliferate. 


John O’Reilly, who has seen recognition come late, uses his montages to embody how quickly the line gets longer, and how quickly the snuffed out candles proliferate. His montages, at least, look ahead to lighted candles.  



Beneath the Sea
2010
gelatin-silver print and paper
6 3/4 x 8 1/4 inches

Nijinsky
2010
halftone montage
9 7/8 x 10 5/8 inches

Princess' Dance
2010
halftone montage
5 x 7 7/8 inches

Strings
2010
color coupler and paper montage
13 3/8 x 11 1/4 inches

The Kiss
2011
halftone montage
7 3/4 x 10 1/2 inches

Monday, July 25, 2011

Patricia Albers 'Joan Mitchell Lady Painter'

In the fall of 1907 Rainer Maria Rilke, living in Paris, made a daily pilgrimage to the Grand Palais to see the posthumous Paul Cezanne retrospective. In between writing his sole novel The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge and his monograph on the sculptor August Rodin, Rilke wrote down his reflections on the Cezanne exhibition to his wife, Clara, then still living in Germany. Rilke, writing fifty years before Joan Mitchell began her painting career which is superbly told in Patricia Albers’ Joan Mitchell Lady Painter, clairvoyantly channeled the pictorial power the American artist’s paintings would evoke.  Rilke’s description of Cezanne’s art could equally apply to Joan Mitchell's:
Today I went to see his pictures again; it’s remarkable what an environment they create. Without looking at a particular one, standing in the middle between the two rooms, one feels their presence drawing together into a colossal reality. As if these colors would heal one of indecision once and for all. The good conscience of these reds, these blues, their simple truthfulness, it educates you; and if you stand beneath them as acceptingly as possible, it’s as if they are doing something for you. You also notice, a little more clearly each time, how necessary it was to go beyond love, too; it’s natural after all, to love each of these things as one makes it: but if one shows this, one makes it less well; one judges it instead of saying it… He certainly would not have shown another human being his love, had he been forced to conceive such a love; but with this disposition, which was completely developed now, thanks to his strangeness and insularity, he turned to nature and knew how to swallow back his love for every apple and put it to rest in the painted apple forever. Can you imagine what that is like, and what it’s like to experience this through him?
Rilke, ‘Letters on Cezanne’
  
Joan Mitchell, an avid reader of Rilke, created art and lived a life that certainly came together in a colossal reality. Patricia Albers, who wrote a biography of the Italian photographer Tina Modotti, describes in vivid colors the startlingly crystalline life Joan Mitchell lived in Chicago, New York, Paris and Vetheuil.
Raised in moneyed elegance amongst Chicago society, Mitchell developed a tough, bratty and privileged demeanor in adolescence. Her father was a distant and demanding surgeon while her mother was a founding editor of the journal Poetry. The combination of clinical exactitude and bohemian expressionism created the two sides of Mitchell’s personality, her strict discipline in the studio as well as her lifelong love of language, poetry and nature.
Mitchell moved to New York in the early fifties with her husband Barney Rosset, the future publisher of the literary underground Grove Press. Joan’s commitment to Rosset, as her commitment to any amorous relationship, was elliptical at best.  Joan soon took up with the unbalanced Ab Ex painter Michael Goldberg. The two young painters, dashing around Manhattan in paint splattered blue jeans, making love on roofs, filching paintings from each other’s apartments, is the most buoyant chapter of her life. Albers vividly sketches the development of Mitchell’s exploding talent. Her love of Modernism, Mozart and painting make for quick reading. An all-star cast of characters whirl around Mitchell, including Franz Kline, Willem de Kooning and the other regulars of the Cedar Tavern. New York City is a kinetic backdrop to Joan’s early story; all night drinking, all day painting, recurring exhibitions and summer vacations on Long Island charm in its’ nostalgia for a distant Bohemia.  
The charm fades, however, as Mitchell’s emotional world became increasingly consumed by alcohol, infidelity and aggression. Mitchell, as Albers only partly explains, had a significantly unbalanced emotional inner life that was greatly exacerbated by alcohol consumption. Joan’s relationships were long drawn out affairs marked by intense violence, both emotional and physical. Mitchell’s relationship with Goldberg, for instance, included multiple abortions, physical abuse and an incident where Mitchell was raped visiting Goldberg in an upstate clinic where he was undergoing psychiatric care.
Starting in the late 50’s Mitchell spent more of her time in France, eventually settling there permanently. She took up in a marriage like relationship with the Canadian painter Jean-Paul Riopelle. Riopelle, who was the leader of the European variety of Abstract Expressionism Taschisme, was the center of a coterie of French artists and intellectuals that included the writer Samuel Beckett, briefly a lover of Joan’s. Towards the beginning of their relationship the two of them lived an energetic creative life in Paris, painting during the day and entertained in cafes at night. For a time Joan’s life in Paris matched the brilliance of her life back in New York.
Parisian gloom sets in and Mitchell’s relationship with Riopelle eventually took on the same flavor as with Goldberg. Intense non-stop fighting, physical violence and perpetual infidelity on both sides strained their teetering but elastic relationship. Added to the mix was the astounding critical and commercial success Riopelle’s work received before Joan’s reputation flourished. Riopelle, an international Ab Ex art celebrity whose star has gone into eclipse, comes alive in Albers’ telling. Her novelistic renderings of lesser known figures in Mitchell’s orbit, Michael Goldberg and Jean Paul Riopelle especially, make the book an important piece of art history and compelling reading.
Starting in the mid-sixties, however, Mitchell’s life becomes a blur of anxiety and alcoholism. Moving to a small town in France Mitchell’s social world became more confined to her studio and her three German shepherds. Exhibitions and retrospectives follow in succession of one another. Young artists and writers weave in and out of the story. Mitchell and Riopelle split for good in the later 70s, and her life afterwards is marred by substance abuse and health problems. She dies of cancer in France in 1992.
 In spite of her enormous talent, three strains kept recurring in the book that undermines the reader’s innate desire to root for this plucky girl from the Midwest. Mitchell’s alcoholism, her disdain for other people’s emotions and her immense economic privilege hampers the reader’s love of this path breaking artist. Joan Mitchell drank and smoked herself to death at a relatively early age of 67. Mitchell, whose amazing Beat-like letters are generously quoted in this biography, could be dismissive and abrasive to people who she felt beneath her. Several important relationships ended abruptly for Mitchell in recrimination and hurt feelings. Towards the end of her life Mitchell would verbally abuse the young visitors to her home for no apparent reason. Also, Joan Mitchell never worked a day in her life; her disdain for middle class niceties was paid for by her daddy’s money. Mitchell didn’t have to work a day job, and the reader is left with the feeling that if she hadn’t had so much free time she might not have spent so much of it nursing a hangover.
Patricia Albers cannot be expected to explain all the psychological contradictions and desires of this demanding and important artist; this is a biography not a novel. Joan Mitchell’s personality in all its feral and cultivated force bears down from the cover photograph to the last page. 
Mitchell, a life-long reader of poetry, would take certain important volumes with her into the studio to help her with the work late at night. Her paintings, glorious, consummate, inspired her life and this book. Rilke, one of Joan Mitchell’s favorites, writing about the torso of Apollo, could again be describing the good conscience of her reds, her blues, her simple but hard won truthfulness. Her painting could certainly cure one of indecision once and for all:

We cannot know his legendary head
with eyes like ripening fruit. And yet his torso
is still suffused with brilliance from inside,
like a lamp, in which his gaze, now turned to low,

gleams in all its power. Otherwise
the curved breast could not dazzle you so, nor could
a smile run through the placid hips and thighs
to that dark center where procreation flared.

Otherwise this stone would seem defaced
beneath the translucent cascade of the shoulders
and would not glisten like a wild beast’s fur:

would not, from all the borders of itself,
burst like a star: for here there is no place
that does not see you. You must change your life



Patricia Albers 'Joan Mitchell Lady Painter'

Friday, July 22, 2011

Lucian Freud 1922-2011

                 July has been a bad month for painting. First Cy Twombly died earlier in the month and now the veteran English realist painter Lucian Freud is dead at the age of 88. Freud, born in Berlin and famously grandson of Sigmund, carried his grandfather’s habit of facing down psychological conflict head on with his nude models on leather couches.  Freud’s grim paintings of portraits and nudes- which he referred to as ‘naked portraits’- exist in perpetually sodden overcast London gloom. While Freud was the scion of a prominent German/Austrian family, his artistic temperament is unabashedly English. His attitude towards the body was more John Wesley than Antoine Watteau. Naked men and women grimace by themselves or in pairs lounging around his down at the heels London studio. His models were friends, family and even some anonymous royalty who agreed to take off their clothes for the artist. Freud’s work had two distinct phases; from tightly controlled surrealist paintings on panels in the manner of Neue Sachlichkeit to larger oil paintings made with hog bristle brushes on canvas that recall Lovis Corinth.
                The happenstance of Freud’s death in the same month as Twombly’s forces a perhaps unnatural, but inevitable, comparison. Flesh and surface were both artists’ subject matter; for Twombly the whole field of the canvas was taken over by fragmented body parts. Freud’s bodies were simply more explicitly realistic than Twombly’s. For both artists the surface of the painting became a metaphor; for Twombly the metaphor was of bodily fluid, for Freud, clotted sagging flesh.
Freud’s passing, like Twombly’s, dims the lights further from a certain generational attitude towards painting. For all Freud’s silliness, his cranky English bohemianism, the sheer propriety poking through the rawest nudes, he maintained a serious regard for classical painting. Freud would routinely show up after hours at the National Gallery to look at his favorite Rembrandts or stare at a fecund corner of an Aelbert Cuyp landscape. Like Twombly, Freud saw the past as a living breathing entity that could transfix the painter in their studio, could help solve the daily practice of painting. The attitude is rare and getting rarer still. Freud will be missed.

Lucian Freud ‘Benefits Supervisor Sleeping’ 

Lucian Freud ‘Painter and Model’ 

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Summer Group Shows New York City


 Painting abounds in New York City this summer. The evergreen group shows that proliferate during the dog days are stocked full of paintings and sculpture that represents only the materials each work was made from. Or so goes the thinking. The wares on display range across the painterly spectrum; from scraps of fabric on the wall to bejeweled glitter cakes to the tried and true oil on canvas. The recent trend of abstract painting and sculpture exhibitions raises to what extent the latest crop of shows represents a distinct new pattern in aesthetic discourse, a momentary infatuation of art world pendulum mood swings or perhaps a generational moment. In any case, the shows afford the chance to see young up and coming artists as well as dynamic groupings of artists and ideas. 
               'Painting Expanded' at Tanya Bonakdar moves beyond the rectangle to incorporate pieces of scrap, monochromes, found objects and stitched paintings. Jacob Kassay has a small double paneled monochrome painting while Amanda Ross-Ho tacks to the wall a torn piece of canvas that has some markings and a pair of sunglasses. The first floor of the gallery is grey, white, black and beige. Upstairs there are some standout works that incorporate an expanded prismatic palette. Artist Lauren Lullof stitches and paints bed sheets and pieces of fabric to create large joyous collage like paintings. Ivan Morley makes Abstract Expressionist tapestries that also could double as throw rugs. Josh Fought incorporates traditions of craft, the monochrome and queer theory into his knitted assemblages.
             The works at the Horton Gallery show 'Monkey Wrench' are looser and more colorful. Hilary Harnischfeger exhibits a turquoise wall relief while Wallace Whitney shows a brushy abstract painting full of purple, green, yellow and blue. Stacy Fisher’s sculpture incorporates Franz West and the grid into a slab of yellow.  Michael Berryhill’s paintings are powdery abstractions that also double as still life painting.
              'Affinities: Painting in Abstraction' at D’Amelio Terras Gallery is the most colorful and spunky of the summer shows; glitter and bejeweled crafts mix elbows with oil on canvas. Carrie Moyer’s 'Lattice' resembles a small ink drawing blown up to a larger dimension.  Joanne Greenebaum’s work has an affinity for Kandinsky but made with thinner paint and color running towards phantasmagorical. Jenny Monick’s small paintings are quick smears of muddy paint that create a swirl in the middle of the canvas.
            Getting out of Chelsea the work becomes even more summer fun. Feature Inc. exhibition 'I am not Monogamous I Heart Poetry' throws together color, painting and sculpture in a promiscuous trist. Bruno Fazzolari painting is a spaghetti bowl of color and paint while Juan Gomez’ presents a fuchsia Zen brush action drawing.  Scooter LaForge and Ted O’Sullivan both combine landscape elements into their abstract paintings that also employ non-traditional materials. 
The final summer note at Rachel Uffner Gallery is 'Summer Whites.' The handsome show is all white paintings and sculptures and feels like a cool crisp Long Island Ice tea sitting on the lawn with Nick Carraway in East Egg. After the color, glitter, fabric and sweltering swirling oil paint, it’s nice to get into the air conditioning.



Monkey Wrench Horton Gallery 504 West 22nd Street
Painting Expanded Tanya Bonakdar Gallery 521 West 21st street
Affinities: Painting In Abstraction Curated by Kate McNamara 525 West 22nd Street D’Amelio Terras Gallery
Katherine Bernhardt, Alfred Jensen, Chris Johanson, Chris Martin, Andrew Masullo, Judith Scott Mitchell-Innes and Nash Gallery 534 West 26th street
I am not Monogamous, I Heart Poetry Feature Inc. 131 Allen Street
Summer Whites Rachel Uffner Gallery 47 Orchard Street



Ivan Morley, A True Tale
2011
thread on canvas
62 1/2 x 34 1/4 inches; 158.8 x 87 cm


Lauren Lullof Yellow Window 2011 Oil, Bleached Fabric Sheets and fabric on Muslin 

Anissa Mack Crown of Thorns 2011 Quilted Denim and Aluminum Leaf 

Jacob Kassay Untitled 2011 Oil and Silver Deposit on Linen in Two Parts

 

Hilary Harnischfeger

Mondsee 2010
Paper, plaster, pigment, ink, crushed glass, amazonite & pyrite
24.5x22.25x4.5" / 62.2x56.5x11.4cm

Michael Berryhill

Pop Up

2011
Oil on linen
11.75x9.25" / 29.8x23.4cm

Stacy Fisher

Yellow And Grey Sculpture On Wood

2011
Hydrocal, burlap, wire mesh, latex paint & wood
42x27x8" / 106.6x68.5x20.3cm

Wallace Whitney

Cow Silk

2011
Oil on canvas
60x48" / 152.4x121.9cm
WW008


Carrie Moyer
Lattice 2011 
72 x 78 inches (182.9 x 198.1 cm) 
acrylic and glitter on canvas 



Joanne Greenebaum
Untitled 2011 
72 x 70 inches (182.9 x 177.8 cm) 
oil, ink and acrylic on canvas 



Jenny Monick
Untitled 2010 
11 x 8 inches (27.9 x 20.3 cm) 
oil on linen 

BRUNO FAZZOLARI: no title, 2010; oil paint on linen; 41 x 36” 
JUAN GOMEZ: Untitled Magenta Figure, 2010

MAI BRAUN: By-Product #1, 2010; acrylic paint, gouache on paper; 39.5 x 27.5” 

SCOOTER LAFORGE: Wolf Spider with Cigar and 4 German Shepherds, 2011;
oil paint on canvas; 32 x 40”

TED O’SULLIVAN: Mantis & Globe, 2010–11; oil paint, paper maché, ground charcoal, marble dust on canvas;
84 x 60”

Ben Gocker, "but out here on a beach chair/ human hands, large numbers/ 8000 Glaciers begin to recede," 2011, wood, canvas, plaster, primer, gesso, aluminum, diameter: 48 inches, 121.9 cm  


Ryan Wallace, "Tablet 9," 2011, mixed media on canvas, 46 x 38 inches, 116.8 x 96.5 cm  


Sam Moyer, Untitled, "(Wood Drawing) I," 2011, pine 1-by-2s, acrylic paint, 60 x 48 inches, 152.4 x 121.9 cm  















Monday, July 18, 2011

Haley Mellin/Olivier Mosset Untitled Gallery

             Abstraction and representation act as Janus faced mirrors of one another in this two person exhibition of Halley Mellin and Olivier Mosset at Untitled Gallery. Just as the viewer acclimates to one pictorial position than the other sneaks up to lay claim to their attention; in this exhibition something and nothing are double sided helixes of the same aesthetic proposition.
Haley Mellin’s paintings-made with oil, encaustic and ink on specially prepared grounds- are representations of the artifacts of studio labor. A white bucket adjacent a corner of a canvas and a clotted rag hung on a white wall are all that is depicted in Mellin’s painting. Olivier Mosset presents a single round canvas painted white hung next to striking yellow wall. Thing-ness and no-thing-ness speak across to each other with Mellin’s and Mosset’s work. The objects depicted in Mellin’s painting represent studio activity through a depiction of painting paraphernalia while becoming themselves the end results of their studio depictions. Her paintings eschew representation by affixing actual staples to her canvases, creating a synthetic blend of the actual and depicted. The frontal depictions-especially the rag paintings-create shimmering violet and fuchsia fantasies on pale white backgrounds that further breaks down the strict realism her work only seems to operate under.  Mosset’s realism is activated by Mellin’s abstraction. While Mellin’s paintings are representations that break down into abstractions, Mosset’s painting builds up from abstraction into an existing presence. Mellin’s wan still lives, the placement next to the yellow wall and the light filled gallery space move Mosset’s painting from an inert art object into a compositional element active in the entire field of the viewer’s attention.  
Olivier Mosset has exhibited his work in pairings before (including the combination of his paintings with the tricked out motorcycles fashioned by Indiana Larry at Spencer Brownstone in 2007).  Contrasting his own mute work with another’s allows inferred tributaries to flow into the mind of the viewer, as happens in this small exhibition. Haley Mellin and Olivier Mosset are more than a generation apart (he born in Bern, Switzerland in 1944 and she in San Francisco, California in 1981). The exhibition represents not so much a passed on tradition or even a shared manner but instead a parallel respect for silence.  Haley Mellin shares the same genetic DNA as the metaphysical Spanish still life painter Juan Sanchez Cotan, who became a Carthusian monk later in life and saw the everyday objects of cabbage, melon and quince as sacred objects of contemplation. Cotan’s still lives call the viewer to silent attention to the world around them as imbued with the glory of the Divine. Haley Mellin concentrates her own work with the same patience and perception as the 17th century Spaniard but uses the studio as a metaphor for her act of silent devotion. That her work can have an affinity with Mosset’s-who has questioned the validity of painting through a continuance of painting-is demonstrated in this exhibition.  

UNTITLED
Haley Mellin / Olivier Mosset



Haley Mellin
5
2011
Oil, encaustic, ink on absorbent ground on linen 28 x 22 inches 71.1 x 55.9 cm



Haley Mellin
2
2011
Oil, encaustic, ink on absorbent ground on linen 16 x 12 inches 40.6 x 30.5 cm


Olivier Mosset
Untitled
2010
Oil on canvas 48 inches in diameter 121.9 cm



Thursday, July 14, 2011

Tom Fairs ‘Drawings’ K.S./Kerry Schuss Art

Graphite renderings of thistles, thatched cottages, shrubs and cathedrals impart moments of reverie in Tom Fairs’ exhibition of drawings at Kerry Schuss Art.  A modicum of means-graphite, palm sized paper, a window curtain, trees,  a corner of a building- open up larger vistas as Blake prescribed the domain of true vision:

To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour

Gossamer transcriptions of small plots of nature and oblique angles of buildings sketched in the last two decades of this Englishman’s life are the sum total of his artistic work. Tom Fairs, who never had a solo exhibition in his lifetime and only started making drawings after his retirement as a teacher of theater design at 60, employed the lead tip of his pencil into a physical equivalent for retinal labor.  Each square inch of the drawings (and the diminutive drawings can be measured into such small increments) supply enough meditative viewing experiences to satisfy. Lines press and slowly search out the form to describe branch, pot, curtain or cobblestone. The economy of purpose warms.
Tom Fairs art is a part of an eccentric tradition of English art that involves Gwen John and the war artist Paul Nash. Gwen John, a Welsh artist who lived most of her life in France in solitude, made exquisite paintings of young girls and cats. Paul Nash, an Englishman who fought in the trenches of WWI, made haunting paintings of etiolated heath-scapes. Both of these artists, as Tom Fairs further demonstrates in this exhibition of drawings, worked from an internal reference point that was profoundly influenced by nature and looking. Touch, sight and nature rapt the viewer to attention in Tom Fairs’ first ever exhibition.    

Tom Fairs
untitled
c. 2000
pencil on paper
8 x 6 inches



Tom Fairs
untitled
c. 2000
pencil on paper
8 x 6 inches



Tom Fairs
untitled
c. 2000
pencil on paper
8 x 6 inches


Tom Fairs
untitled
c. 2000
pencil on paper
8.75 x 6 inches



Tom Fairs
untitled
1995
pencil on paper
8 x 6 inches


Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Al Held ‘1959’ Craig F. Starr Gallery

                A single oil painting hangs above the receptionist’s desk as the sole reminder of the old school Abstract Expressionism that first vivified Al Held.  The painting is all spindly lines, runny paint, loopy shapes and jarring colors. The rest of the exhibition ‘Al Held ‘1959’’ is Held taking a few square inches of that painting and making a series of drawings in acrylic based around the simplified forms and colors.
                Al Held, born in 1928, three years after Joan Mitchell and a year after Alfred Leslie, was part of the ‘Second Generation’ of Abstract Expressionism. Held, as this small exhibition of his drawings attests, helped forge a path out of heroic gesture painting towards a third way of picture making. Like his contemporaries Mitchell and Leslie, Held first worked seriously in the vein of painterly abstraction. A self-described malcontent, Held did not start painting until he got out of the Navy right after WWII. Using his GI bill money, Held went to Paris to study art after getting the taste in the Art Students League. Held returned to New York in 1953 and in 1959 had his first one person exhibition. The moment he began to establish himself as an Abstract Expressionist he began to fall out with the style. Instead Held began to paint hard edged paintings depicting simple forms and clean edges. Eventually Held’s work developed into hyper colorful abstract paintings of lines and forms that resembled overpasses and candy colored highways receding into deep space.  
                Due to the acrylic medium Held maintains in these paintings, the colors in each work remain fresh. Held employs a reduced but jarring palette of cadmium yellow, red, alizarin crimson, black, white and cobalt blue. Held’s simple vocabulary of shapes, circles and triangles are placed usually at the center of the paper. Held is reducing his language to bare necessities to work his way out of the sturm und drang of Ab Ex and into the fuller, simpler scaled paintings he would execute in the 1960s.
                Al Held, Joan Mitchell and Alfred Leslie each offered a way out of the ‘Second Generation’ ghetto; Mitchell through an investigation of Symbolist color-as-nature; Lesley though a gritty reexamination of the figure and Held by combining the restraint of Neo-Geo with the all over excitement of Pollock. Held’s work has not had the critical success as Mitchel or Leslie. It’s time a New York museum took up the challenge to present a full dress appraisal of his life’s work (Whitney Museum of American Art?). Until that happens, we must be content with smaller gallery offerings (like the 2009 show of late works at Paul Kasmin Gallery in Chelsea). Viewers should do themselves a favor and check out this small but compelling exhibition of fulcrum works by an under represented New York painter.

Al Held
Untitled, 1959
Oil and collage on paper mounted on canvas
40 x 44-1⁄2 inches



Al
E 60-3, 1959
Acrylic on paper mounted on board
18-1⁄4 x 23-3⁄4 inches


Al
Untitled, 1959
Acrylic on paper
18 x 23-3⁄4 inches


Untitled (E60.18), 1959
Acrylic on paper mounted on board
18-3⁄4 x 23-3⁄4 inches



Untitled (G-60-5), 1959
Acrylic on paper mounted on board
16-7⁄8 x 13-7⁄8 inches


Untitled (G-60-06), 1959
Acrylic on paper mounted on board
16-7⁄8 x 13-7⁄8 inches



Untitled "N", 1960
Acrylic on paper mounted on canvas
35 x 37-3⁄4 inches


Untitled "U", 1959
Acrylic on canvas
12 x 16 inches



Craig Taylor ‘Paintings and Drawings’ Sue Scott Gallery

Craig Taylor’s first exhibition with Sue Scott Gallery mines the language of abstraction for middling results.  Paintings of stripes and zips coalesce around Whistler hued silverish monochromes. His chromatically saturated painted abstraction/landscape/forms resemble funky Thomas Nozkowski paintings or un-funky Elizabeth Murray rectangles.   Prismatic colored canvases with zany titles jostle around the eye without sitting down to do the hard business of meaning something.
Gesture-Driven-Interface, from 2010, is a good example of Taylor’s shortcomings. The bottom fifth of the painting is dirty, the kind of dirty that is the result of directionless painting. Pentimenti become detritus when the trowel is allowed to do the work of the painter.  The top of the canvas is noodled on in a grey film over the moss green under painting. Maroon bars then fill in an otherwise uninteresting form. Pastoral from 2011, while it does not have such chromatic jumps as Gesture, suffers from a failure of nerve. The painting drifts into Whistlerian Nocturnes territory without stating an appropriate emotional or painterly rationale for such a contemporary investigation.  The painting Serum Tickle also from 2011, however, has a genuine sense of humor that the larger paintings fail to convey.  Permanent green mouse ears float on some vague form that could be a body. The drawings/collage/works on paper point more to a personal exploration. The series ‘The Blossomy Realm or, Two Men Driving and One Screaming” from 200-2011 incorporate pencil, marker and collage on small sheets of paper. The ‘Blossomy Realm…’ drawings do not have the baggage and trappings of the large paintings. Liberated from the history of oil paint, the drawings act out and demonstrate the fun lurking just behind this exhibition.  


Craig Taylor Pastoral, 2011






 




Saturday, July 9, 2011

Nick Goss ‘Herz Man Sky’ Simon Preston Gallery

Dystopias abound in Englishman’s Nick Gross’ first New York City exhibition ‘Herz Man Sky’. The press release has a quote from the master of disaster Cormac McCarthy while the artist further references a series of failed political ideologies from, ‘colonialism to Fascism to the American Frontier.’ The works in the exhibition, large oil paintings and small watercolors on paper, of concrete buildings surrounded by palm trees, are painted in thin washes of sepia and grisaille. The exhibition, consisting of six large paintings with an extended series of watercolors, was created by the artist in a residency in Vienna where a local thrift store named Herzmansky supplied the title of the show.
                The paintings, brushed in broad washes with splotches of thick marks that describe the form, have various lineages from Matta by way of Magnus Von Plesson, or the movie posters of Peter Doig. Despite the literary references and topical subject matter the paintings feel too perfunctory to be truly satisfying.  Painterly washes that just take up space stand in for real pictorial investigation. The wash technique better serves the watercolors. Fragility and the vulnerability that real political failure induces are more in evidence with the works on paper. Seen in tandem with the large paintings, however, the 1:1 correlation of techniques further erodes the visual force of the larger canvases. The one painting that had the right amount of marks to wash is Lamp which feels like Michael Krebber by way of the Casbah. The exhibition ‘Herz Man Sky’ shows a fine literary predilection that should be more in service to a painterly sensibility.   

Nick Goss 
Lamp 
2011 
oil on canvas 
78.7 x 51.2 in. / 200 x 130 cm.




Nick Goss 'Herz Man Sky'





Nick Goss 
Carousel 
2011 





Nick Goss 
Turbine 
2011 
oil on canvas 
78.7 x 118.1 in. / 200 x 300 cm